Intensities

September 8th, 2007

A while ago I got peripherally embroiled in a debate about polyamory. Well, not a debate really - an exchange, between a poly friend of mine and an ‘ambassador’ in one of South Africa’s online swinger communities. Said swinger had an almost laughable inability to understand what polyamory meant: for the uninitiated, polyamory is the practice of having multiple love relationships (as opposed to monogamy, where you couple off with the One you love). I’m in a poly relationship - my wife (who has a blog on this site) has a boyfriend (now fiance), and she’d be fine with me having a lover, girlfriend, etc. if the right person came along.

Anyway, back to your story. Said swinger originally criticised poly for “offering love as a party snack or entertainment”, contrasting this with her love (her “most secret beauty of me”) that “belongs to the man who occupies my heart, mind, body and soul” and goes on “the intensity of my love does not allow me to offer this gift to another being, not now, not ever.”

Fast forward a week or two, and the poly peril rears its head again - this time, in the form of a complaint at a South African BDSM site that adverts for poly events (lunches, and the like) “open the door to all swinger communities, and anything even vaguely linked to promiscuity and sex”. In this case the poster seemed very insistent on protecting BDSM as a lifestyle and “psychological orientation” from BDSM as (merely?) a “sexual kink”… much debate following.

But back to the subject line of this post: intensities. I’m trying to untangle something about the strange tension between elements of the “alternative (sexual) lifestyle” communities (in South Africa at least), and also something about myself.

In both discussions I mentioned, promiscuity appeared as a threat - whether it was sexual promiscuity, or a kind of “promiscuous love”. And in both cases, there was some kind of deeply personal space (”psychological orientation” and “most secret beauty of me”) which seemed to be under threat from this promiscuity. One could see this in almost Heideggerian terms - the poetics of secret beauty versus the undifferentiated mass of promiscuity.

So… That which is special is seen as that which is rare, is individual…. under threat from triviality of the mass or the many, the banality of promiscuity (of sex!) when contrasted to the “secret beauty” of love or the BDSM lifestyle. Ok, hold that thought, because I’d like to suggest a different take on this.

I’m currently reading an essay by the French philosopher Giles Deleuze that meditates on Baruch Spinoza’s concept of “affect”. Yeah, wheels within wheels. In short, this is basically Deleuze discussing emotion, using Spinoza’s concepts as a lens. Anyway, there are three key point:

1) As we travel through life we experience ‘good encounters’ (joy) and ‘bad encounters’ (sadness), in so far as that which we encounter connects with the parts that make up ourselves, or conversely, clashes with our particular ‘mixture’. Deleuze uses as an example of the ultimate ‘bad encounter’ cyanide - that which is ‘me’ encounters cyanide, and my relation is dismantled. I die. Or he speaks of walking down the road - I encounter Anna, and this provokes in me feelings of rage, hurt or inadequacy - a bad encounter. Walking further, I encounter Blacks, and this provokes in me feelings of hope, friendship - a good encounter. The examination of ‘good encounters’, ‘bad encounters’ and the way they increase or diminish our energy for action is the key point of Deleuze’s essay.

2) If we move to the next level, we do not simply perceive a varying intensity of good encounters / bad encounters, but we go further, we examine their causes. And through examining these causes, we identify common elements - a ‘good encounter’ between me and you may cause me to reflect on something that exists in both of us, increasing my knowledge about myself at the same time as I gain knowledge about you. Conversely, a bad encounter is a form of dissonance. No ‘common element’ is discovered, and as Deleuze says, through sadness we learn nothing. Sadness is, for Deleuze, the emotion of kings and priests, and philosophy is most useful as the examine of life, of its possibilities and potentials. The meditation on death (ala. Kierkegaard, for instance) is an utterly useless pursuit.

3) Our power of being affected is not infinite. It has a limit - or rather our different elements each have their power of being affected, and their limits to this power. Spinoza gives the example of being tickled - this is in a ‘local joy’, producing a kind of pleasure in part of us, but when it overwhelms our power of being affected, it ceases to be joyful. Anything - sexual, emotional, physical, intellectual, etc etc - that exceeds a body’s power of being affected is a ‘bad encounter’. Of, this limit is not an absolute - many things are beyond a baby’s power of being affected - the loudness of a wild concert might provoke in me joy, but in my baby daughter this is too much, she cries, it is ugly for her. The power of being affected is a characteristic of its make-up, and changes as that make-up changes.

So to return… the private poetry that the correspondents I cited seek to protect strikes me as an attempt to limit ‘bad encounters’, but it is a limit imposed in the form of, and the ideology, of the private. At the center stands the individual, which preserves its sanctity (and its sanity) through a closing-off, a definition of what is private (and pleasurable, special, etc) versus what is public (and intrusive, banal, dangerous). What offends me about this is the particular form that this ‘closing off’ takes - through the policing of discursive boundaries (*this* is good BDSM/swinging, *that* is bad promiscuity) the question of intensities and encounters is displaced - and to top it all, a certain (perverse - ha ha) joy is taken in the submission to said boundaries.

In essence, I feel that what is being established is an “alternative morality”. For sure, maybe not the one that is preached on the pulpit on Sunday, but still a morality, a code of rights and duties. And then - no wonder there is such tension in the air, because morality cannot exist without seeking to be hegemonic, seeking to be Morality. Not just principles, but Laws. Looking at things this way, it is also not at all surprising that much effort is spent on definitions - what is promiscuity, what is swinging, what is polyamory, what is BDSM. Bah! One of the best things Deleuze ever said is: “don’t ask what a body is, ask what it can do”! Baruch Spinoza’s master-work is called the “Ethics” precisely because it is a consideration, not of duty, but of capability. What can we *do*? Wherein lies our power of action? As Deleuze explains: “ethics is a problem of power, never a problem of duty. In this sense Spinoza is profoundly immoral. Regarding the moral problem, good and evil, he has a happy nature because he doesn’t even comprehend what this means. What he comprehends are good encounters, bad encounters, increases and diminutions of power.”

Getting back to earth - my response to the swinger who denounces poly as reducing love to a “party snack” is that yes, I understand this discomfort - there is even a term in poly circles for lining up a fresh sweetie every week (its called NRE (New Relationship Energy) addiction). But new love, multiple love, even (responsible) promiscuity (of an emotional or physical kind) is not wrong - what it often is, however, is uncomfortable. Having set up life in a certain way, a ‘click’, ‘chemistry’ with a new person may well exceed your power of being affected. It may be too much, threatening to dissolve your particular self. But as Deleuze says ‘[t]he most beautiful thing is to live on the edges, at the limit of her/his own power of being affected’.

Similarly for the offended BDSMer - and here it is not at all surprising that sex is the troublesome element, for in sex we find such intense encounters. And at the same time, our society’s sex-negative outlooks means for many of us, our power of being affected is easily exceeded by sexual encounters. I’m sure I am not the only person around here who has been provoked to tears by their own sexuality. And one last thing - as Foucault pointed out, the powerful intensity of sexual desire is a site for power to operate on our bodies, a place managed through continual attraction/repulsion. It is not surprising so many of us enjoy power/sex games - sexualisation (the socialisation of a sexuality) places a little policeman/woman deeply in our psyches. Nonetheless, we still have to provide our own handcuffs. ;) And on the other hand, there is an element in our society that encourages encountering our limits through play, through the consumption of sensations. See for instance, adventure sports, Fear Factor, and the growing popularity of ‘kinky’ items for couples. As with pretty much everything else in our society, the encounter with our limits of being affected is dissolved in money and dished up as simple consumption… something Heidegger was concerned about when he talked about the mass, its undifferentiated energy that so threatens (for him) poetry.

Still - the BDSM guy (girl?)’s attempt to fortify the Church of BDSM is laughable (as are all the other Churches, of God, or Swinging or Poly ;) ). Listen up - the big world is outside your secret garden.

I only hope to, in life, experience good encounters, explore intensities to the limit, enhance - and not denounce - my power of being affected. Well, I guess that serves as an intro - welcome to my blog everyone! ;)

P.S. the self-definition of certain South Africa ‘alternative lifestyle’ communities is pretty hysterical, given that I know so many lives that - in their often drunken, messed up, incoherent way - defy both ‘normality’ and every ‘alternative lifestyle’ I know.

Toxic Death Kommando Militia

June 27th, 2007

Last night I went to go see Toxic Death Kommando Militia (TDKM), the punk band my friend plays in. (Ridiculous name - they were called Skum before, but apparently there’s another band called Skum, so they got this new one. So what do they do if they find another band called TDKM? Just add more words? “(peacefully)” was proposed)

Good stuff, it was. Hardcore punk with lots of noise and a little bit of moshing (most of the crowd was standing around, not dancing…). Much beer was drunk, and I even dragged my friend Sarah, business-finance-something (now ex) student from Stellenbosch (originally from Namibia) along. Strange too, because in a way this is “my culture”, at least the culture of part of me. The music I choose to listen to when on my own is this noisy stuff, rebel music. So part of me was watching the performance, in a way watching (part of) myself from the outside. I was left happy, but also uncomfortable. Uncomfortable because I couldn’t ignore the whiteness of the crowd, the location (another one of Antonio’s places - he’s the Cape Town “alternative” club baron), the fact that despite the grunginess of everyone’s attire, there was probably a few thousand Rands of equipment up on stage. This “creative freedom” is still so trapped in the system of money, power and domination. And not only this, but this was fun. Fucking good fun! But fun knowing its limits. As opposed to… fun/joy/pleasure that creates its own conditions of possibility. (Yes, thanks Eloise for helping me clarify that!)

Anyway, we also got talking last night - me & the members of TDKM - about culture, especially in the context of my weekend, which was consumed by the sangoma-ritual that my wife organised at our house. (The house got taken over by sangomas, from Thursday to Sunday it was dancing, drinking, twaza (”initiation”) without end) Along with these sangomas (and the Ancestors) come lots of references to “tradition”. Apparently a goat was slaughtered (and a chicken) too because that is “tradition”. Thus my point about - my drunken dancing is “my tradition”. ;) I must admit, I’m not terribly happy - as I’ve been saying to people, if you want to point to tradition (and ancestors), my tradition is to go stomping round with a gun and enslave (Black) people. I encountered tradition before, when I was a laaitie (translation: kid) living in  Pinelands going to the NG Kerk (translation: Dutch Reformed Church - the “official Church of Apartheid”). A big part of my childhood was spent at war with tradition, so I’m not so keen on its re-appearance. At the same time, I know this is simplistic - I know a ton of whiteys who pretend they are so free of the stamp/hand/land of their fathers (and mothers), but it sticks with you, no matter what. No one is a simply a person, simply a human. What I have reconciled myself with (in terms of my identity) is still a form of tradition, a form of idea that has forgotten where it comes from.

Heh, the most lasting traditions are quite material - I might say “everything is up from grabs”, but then… my house? my car? I cling to a material existence, and it is this very material existence that feels undermined in sangoma-land. My dreams? I don’t remember them - 99.9% of the time I wake up in the morning, wander to the computer, and have no sense of where my head went during my sleeping hours. For me ritual confuses, rather than clarifies. I spend very little time on questions of meaning, much more time considering effects, life as history unrolling. So I’m making this post in a way as a place-holder - this is me, today. Life (in the absence of a beer-in-the-hand) is complicated. Ok? Let’s see what happens next.

Update on Ogoniland

June 8th, 2007

Pastor Barry Barinaadaa Wuganaale is the project coordinator of Ogoni Solidarity Forum, an organization floated through Ogoni exiles in Africa that are fighting to carry on the mantle and original vision of the late Ken Saro Wiwa..

Apart from having background in marketing, Barry Wuganaale is a trained pastor with specialization in discipleship. From 1999, the United Nations High Commission for Refugees stopped considering Ogonis as persecuted activists in the tiny country that depends largely on Nigeria for its economic leverage; Pastor Barry became instrumental to the formation of campaign front that had been fighting to put pressure on the UNHCR.

His background as a pastor helped in the coordination of an exiled community of Ogonis in Ouidah, the ancient capital of the country. He formed a non-denominational refugee prayer fellowship that still runs in the makeshift refugee camp in Benin Republic and the fellowship had created positive impact upon the exiled Ogoni community. He has been arrested and tried for exposing the corruption at UNHCR severally; following threats to his life, the Ogoni community in Ouidah mandated him to relocate to South Africa, where he is currently cultivating an international campaign platform for the refugees in Benin and the Ogoni struggle broadly.

Pastor Barry has spoken on the Ogoni issue at forums in and out of South Africa. As the Project Coordinator of the Ogoni Solidarity Forum, he works fulltime on voluntary basis and says he is not worried about getting another job because Ogoni struggle is life long vocation. As part of his devotion to the cause of liberation for the Ogoniland he also decided to donate all his written works to the cause. On the 28th of July, three of his books would be launched in Cape Town.

Despite Pastor Barry’s busy schedule (he will participate in the forcoming International Book Fair in Cape Town and launch his books in July), Peter van Heusden of Cape Town Indymedia recently caught up with him to speak about the Ogoni struggle, against the background of the Mathew Kukah’s recent visit to Cape Town and General Olusegun Obasanjo handing over of the presidency in Nigeria (on the 29th May).

Handover to Yar’Adua: the second time that Obasanjo is setting a stage for anarchy

Peter: Can you briefly sketch the background to the Ogoni situation in Nigeria, the events leading up to the MOSOP struggle and finally the execution of Ken Saro Wiwa and the others of the Ogoni Nine?

Pst. Barry: The Ogoni ethnic minority in the Niger Delta is one out of the estimated 250 ethnic groups that was grafted by the colonial masters to form the Nigerian nation state. It has been discovered since after the Nigerian flag independence that the country was fabricated for the imperial interest by the British government and their allies. This has haunted the country because its federal and multi ethnic composition continue to lead to agitations and political miasma.

Ken Saro Wiwa raised this issue as far 35 years ago after the civil war, but he was ignored. He argued endlessly that a country with multi ethnic composition cannot be ruled as a unitary state. He decried the fact that peoples’ ethnic backgrounds was the sole ticket for accessing education, public services, basic services, political appointments and in most cases the power to loot the resources that are tapped from the small ethnic groups.

Ken argued that there was no basis for some people to be treated as inferior and internal slaves because they are small in population or because another group happens to be more in number. He revisited the histories of the ethnic nations that make up Nigeria before the advent of slavery and colonialism. He also discovered that if there is no crude oil there is no Nigeria. Yet, on the same stroke, the people from whose lands the oil are being drilled are held in paradoxical enslavement through: one, Obnoxious decrees and criminal acquisition of the oilfields from the indigenous peoples, two, the protracted militarize of the Nigerian politics, by this l mean, both full fledge military and disguise military and military surrogates and politicians. The third factor is the pseudo and perfidious operation of constitutional provisions to oppress the minorities. This is linked to aristocratic/criminal economic web that totally disregard the local and indigenous communities because of the delirium of pomposity by trans-national companies, in the case of the Ogoni, Shell Petroleum Development Company.

Ken decided to mobilize his own people to break this jinx. The Ogonis were a litmus test of ending imperialism that had been ingrained in Nigeria. Even though others were suffering the same fate as the Ogonis, he used his own people because the Ogonis were for years the weeping child of the Niger Delta region. We were held in some proverbial and legendary impish status, for decades our neighbors believed that we belonged to unenviable ebb. This unfortunate situation made it that even the best of idea coming from Ogoni could not be embraced by other tribes.

The other contrast in history is that the Ogoni ethnic nation is one of the richest oil producing communities in the quasi Nigeria. But the most unfortunate thing around the geo-histo-political background of the Ogoni people is that despite producing about 30,000 barrels of crude oil a day as against about 300, 000 barrels a day when oil was first discovered in 1958, 90% of the whole Nigeria had never heard of the Ogonis before 1990. While those who had managed to hear about them, only believed that Ogoni was a place to go and get people for domestic and demeaning jobs at slave rate. Shell Petroleum Development Company, the oil stronghold that operated in Ogoniland for 33 years, admits that in those years the Ogoniland has produced about 680 million barrels of crude oil. Yet, Ogoniland and its people have within these years suffered chronic deprivations in the Nigerian status quo.

Peter: You mean all these facts are instrumental to the formation MOSOP?

Pst. Barry: Yes, this background gave birth to the philosophy that is the bedrock of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) by Ken Saro-Wiwa in 1990. To me, the words “Movement” and “Survival” are both epiphany words for the Ogoni people. I feel proud to have been born in the generation that this great epiphany took place, l feel happy that l suffered this marginalization and also partook in the “Movement” to move out of where the world placed us. I feel happy that l can paint the picture of Ken through what l saw and knew of him to my children and grand children, if, l am alive to see them.

Peter: What was the method that MOSOP used in achieving its great mobilization?

Pst. Barry: MOSOP mobilized the Ogoni people into a non-violent resistance against internal and external oppression and imperialism. The organization highlighted the plights of the land and became the megaphone that exposed the evil political practice of modernized slavery through manipulated state apparatus. MOSOP, through her nine affiliate bodies, recruited thousands of activists for the purpose of ensuring fairness in the management and distribution of the Nigerian national wealth that is mainly obtained from the small tribes that are located in the Niger Delta.

The Ogoni, under the coordination of MOSOP, became the first ethnic nationality that submitted their people motivated socio-cultural and political demands christened the Ogoni Bill of Rights (OBR). By the Bill, the Ogoni people are demanding reparation, royalty, compensation, and environmental rights, implementation of true federalism or confederalism and protection of the minorities.

Peter: How did Ken influence all these process?

Pst. Barry: Ken was the ideologue of the struggle, the symbol of freedom for us and he was a methodical person as well because the elementary stage of the mobilization was done through political education conducted in cell groups, and later expanded to village and kingdom levels; information was disseminated according to layers and strata. Knowledge was reduced to its applicability level as much as possible. The ordinary Ogoni farmers and fishermen were told that oil spill was inimical to their occupation because crude oil contained dangerous “chemical” and “acid” that destroyed the potency of their farmlands, streams and rivers. And that this is what resulted in low productivity of the environment, and that it logically means that Shell was the source of their poverty despite living in an environment of plenty. That their children are getting out of schools since they could not pay the fees and their children would remain peasants and unable to access better living. That is if the children do not become paupers by the time Shell is done and gone.

Peter: What was the effect of the execution of the Ogoni Nine on MOSOP and the people of Ogoniland? What happened next?

Pst. Barry: The killing of Ken Saro Wiwa and the eight others was a lynch pin approach and the government and Shell certainly did their homework very well. They knew that without Ken, there would be no mobilizer, no funder, no international town crier, no pen to craft and expose their dirty acts and mostly the struggle would have no soul.

I tell you, the Ogonis where not prepared for the sudden exit of Ken, it is a shock, a set-back. The government and Shell did passed a knife through the hearts of the Ogoni people by that singular action. By my private investigation, a young man who was in prison the day that Ken was being hanged told me that prisoners would have revolted but the government knowing what they wanted to do, made sure that all cells were properly locked on that day.

I can tell you that if given the chance, even 1, 000 Ogonis would have volunteered their lives for Ken to be free and liberate the land. He is the first man that showed that the people can trust him after Paul Timothy Birabi who first organized the Ogoni people died in a mysterious circumstance that is not divorced from the need to liberate the Ogonis. I would have been one of such people that would have happily died for Ken to be free. You see, a soul is soul and we are all equal before God, but the life and times of Ken is the hub and puzzle that makes the Ogoni to fall into place and without him the whole place is fragmented. Ogoni would hardly have come to the same level that he put us. Apart from internationalizing our plights, the Ogonis had never been united the way they did under Ken. The whole kingdom chauvinistic politics that used to tear us apart disappeared. Everybody, Gokana, Khana, Eleme, Tai became just Ogoni and nothing more or less.

Peter: In June 1998, the Nigerian dictator, Sani Abacha died, and after an interim period under Abdulsalem Abubakar, Olusegun Obasanjo won the presidential elections, inaugurating a new era of democracy in Nigeria. How would you characterize this transition to democracy, and how has it affected the Ogoni and the other people of the Delta region?

Pst. Barry: First, Olusegun Obasanjo that goes out of power today, the 29th of May, is the real Satan on the Niger Delta peoples. He was the man that promulgated the Land Use Decree in 1978 as a military head of state. The Decree striped the indigenous peoples’ of their right to the ownership of their lands, almost akin to what the former apartheid government did to the blacks, colored and Indians in South Africa.

He was the choice of the military at a very turbulent time in the politics of Nigeria, a compromise and pacification to the Yoruba ethnic group in particular, because of the annulment and murder of Chief MKO Abiola1. An ambassador friend of mine informed me that the decision of Obasanjo to become the president of Nigeria post-Abacha was reached by international interests that transcend Nigerian domestic politics. When l look at the kind of accolade that the man had got for doing nothing, how he had soared on international wing, debts cancelled to fool the Nigerian people and the branding of Obasanjoism, it add up in the light of what my friend told.

Assured in his ululating fanfare politics he created the platform that gave rise to the militia movements. The intention of Obasanjo and the oil moguls is to force the region into a full scale war that would allow them to drill under war just like what has happened on the diamond fields in places like Congo and Liberia. The arms being used in the Niger delta, some were bought by the Obasanjo government to use against opposition but the situation slipped out of his control. There are also those that bought their own arms for genuine causes and there those that had found the situation as an opportunity to help themselves.

Peter: Today, he is handing over to another civil government?

Pst. Barry: It is not the first time; l would no bother with the fact of the fraud of the election but l can tell you the Buhari, Babangida and Abacha2 governments are the bye-product of the handover that he did in 1979. He gave government to Shehu Shagari, a stooge against the chief Obafemi Awolowo who presume winner of that election. What followed is a series of military dethronement and the institutionalization of corruption. By putting Yar’Adua Musa and Goodluck Jonathan, he has set the stage for anarchy for the second time. Yar’Adua lacks the support of his own people; Goodluck lacks the acceptability of the Niger Delta.

There are a lot of people who believes that they, the controversial president and his vice, are not supported in the country; more still some of these people are very influential. They are the kind of people that motivate for military intervention. If the military takeover Nigeria, nothing would happen. As long as the western world is sure of their oil supply, nothing would happen. Nigeria is not Togo or Sae Tome and the Principe, you are talking of a country that supplies 2.5 million barrels of crude oil to the world market. Yar’Adua would love to coerce some of these powerful people and they would toss him and his vice around. Goodluck would try to hold the Niger Delta together for the sake of his political career and by the first and the second year, they would be busy trying to keep their house in order and compromising so that their government would gain credibility. Under these circumstances, anything can happen. I pity Jonathan and Yar’Adua they have been cowed into cleaning the mess of old man.

Peter: Since 1995, MOSOP and the Ogoni struggle to some extent faded from international attention, and were replaced in prominence (for a while) by the formation of the Ijaw Youth Council and the publication of the Kaiama Declaration in 1998. As an outside observer, some aspects of the Ijaw struggle seem similar to that of the Ogoni, i.e. an ethnic group, long ignored in Federal Republic of Nigeria, stands up and voices its concerns about oil revenue and the impact of oil exploitation on the people and the environment. In response, there are armed attacks, killings and a general climate of threat. What is your feeling about the Ijaw struggle, and its relation (positive or negative) to the Ogoni struggle?

Pst. Barry: The Ijaw people have the history of fighting against capital imperialism and marginalization, oppression and external domination like the Ogoni people. The Ijaw first struggled against pre-colonial authorities that came to the Niger Delta region for trading on raw produce like palm oil and timber. After that era, we had Isaac Adaka Boro, whom Ken Saro Wiwa have a lot of respect for, going by his account in his Nigerian civil war diary, “On the Darkling Plane”. The Ijaw people are the biggest ethnic group in the Niger Delta and the fourth largest in Nigeria; oil was first extracted in commercial quantities in Oloibiri in Ijaw land. Sadly, these wonderful history and antecedence was lost on them because of their involvement in the Nigerian mainstream politics post-Nigerian civil war.

The Ijaw got highly involved into the ultra-right politics and forgot the warrior and resistance element of their ethnic nationality. The Ogoni struggle helped them to rediscover the need to fight to regain their ethnicity which had been compromised. The Ijaw ethnic nationality and the Ogoni people had a lot in common, in the past and even now. Ogoni fishermen are still in places like Member, Brass and other remote fishing settlement. To my knowledge, the Ijaw people had never attacked the Ogonis living in their areas or the other way around. Most of Ken’s closest friends were Ijaws. When Alamesieghe became the governor of Bayesa; one of his PA was Mr. Sunday Nwidor, an Ogoni. Oronto Douglas had done a lot of work on Ogoni struggle and l can go on and on to tell you of working relationship between us and them.

The Kaiama declaration is not accidental; the plan had been there before the killing of Ken. l recall that l was the General Secretary of the Ogoni Community in Kaduna in 1993. On the occasion that l was sent to Ken’s office in Port Harcourt to pay some money in support of MOSOP, l met the then NYCOP president, Mr. Goodluck Diigbo and from discussions, he told me that he was going to attend a rally later that day to address some Ijaw groups in a suburb of Port Harcourt. Some Ogonis like Patrick Naagbantor played prominent role in the Kaiama Declaration. The idea before the killing of Ken was that each ethnic group in the Niger Delta was going to mobilize themselves and decide what they wanted and that we shall all meet at a conference to put collective pressure on the federal government, Shell and their imperial associates.

The Ogoni Bill of Rights was the first demand that came from the region, but it is largely a reflection of the broad situation that every ethnic group in Niger delta is passing through and a prototype of their political and economic aspirations. That is why, the OBR says, “what the Ogoni people demand for themselves; namely, autonomy, they also asked for others.” So the relationship is in many ways similar, but the difference is that the Ijaw struggle seems to be graduating too fast into arms struggle.

The reason for this is that Obasanjo went to wake the sleeping dog by the heartless massacre of the Odi village3. I do not know what the government would pay to the Ijaw people in exchange for the souls that Obasanjo killed in that land. He asked God and Nigerians to forgive him two days ago, yes, God can forgive, but the Ijaw people are humans. The Ijaw people have a history of arms struggle, they are warriors, they know how to fight, they have been through it many times, the topography of their area allows for that kind of guerilla war, but in Ogoniland, one cannot start that kind of struggle. We are also concerned about the fact that the federal government libeled Ken Saro Wiwa as being violent when he was not, hence, anything that we do in the direction of violence would lend credence to the propaganda of the government. Therefore, between the Ogoni struggle and the Ijaw’s, it is basically the same thing but different tactics.

Peter: Most recently, the non-violent struggles of MOSOP and the IYC have been seemingly been replaced by the armed struggle of groups such as the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta. Is this assessment accurate? How do you now see the way forward for the struggles in the Delta?

Pst. Barry: First, even though l do not subscribe to violence, l do not have anything against the people who claim to be militants or those who believe that they want to use arms to regain their freedom. The people of Niger Delta had tolerated a lot. In June of 2000, the Nigerian embassy sent a team of diplomats to broker negotiation with me on behalf of the Ogoni activists; the team was lead by one John Onuha and I. A Paragalda. l asked Paragalda, who is a northern, “if oil was found in the north, could l as an Ogoni man have the right to come and drill it?” I once asked a Yoruba Pastor friend of mine that same question and he could not answer it. What has happened in the Niger Delta, even some angels cannot tolerate it.

It is not done anywhere, that you just come and start scooping resources in someone’s house, take everything away and leave the people with nothing for five decades; if the people rise up, you ask soldiers paid with money that accrues from the oil you stole from these people to shoot at them. I have told my friends from other parts of the country that the Ogoni people and other Niger delta peoples had contributed to sustain the country for 50 years and it is now time for us to care for ourselves. The Hausas, Yorubas4 and other groups that have not contributed should also try as much we have tried. Therefore, given the circumstances, the taking of hostage is concomitant to the fact that the peoples of the Niger Delta had been held at hostage for a long time. But my fear is that the use of arms could always be infiltrated by agents of the government as it is. Arms struggle need a lot of organization and time for it to mature, it need a lot of maturity and clear definition. I am afraid that the MEND does not strike me as an organization that is coordinated for that task. I would prefer them making it impossible for the oil companies to continue operations and leaving human beings out of the show.

Peter: In your recent article for Pambazuka, the Ogoni Solidarity Forum and yourself confronted Reverend Mathew Kukah on the question of the Nigerian elections and situation in Nigeria today. Could you clarify who Reverend Kukah is and what is the Oputa Panel that you mentioned while protesting this meeting?

Pst. Barry: Rev. Fr. Mathew Kukah is the Secretary of the Catholic Church in Nigeria, he shoot into prominence as a cleric that believes in social justice. He has done a lot of work on balancing Christian religion with politics. He is from a minority ethnic group in the north, the first time that l knew of him was in 1992 when his people killed Moslems and Hausa people in Zango Kataf. The first time that he said something about the Ogoni struggle was in 1993, when he said that Ken Saro Wiwa is over emphasizing the issue of the Ogoni people. He is practically, like the Desmond Tutu of South Africa, but he lacks the kind of credibility that Tutu has. Maybe, in wanting to market himself into that kind of image, he jumped at the offer to serve on a Human Right Violation Commission headed by retired justice Chwukwudifo Oputa. And that is why the commissioned was christened Oputa Panel. The panel looked at about 10, 000 petitions of human right abuses in the country from 1966; the cases of the Ogoni people alone took 80% of the total petitions. Before l go on, think of a panel that covered from 1966 to 1996, but what the Ogonis suffered from 1993 to 1996, out numbered the whole country. After the panel’s seating, a friend came all the way from Nigeria to meet in Benin Republic to apologize to me, saying that when l use to cry and talk about the terrorization of our land she use to think that they were exaggerations and propaganda.

The panel ended and not every body had the opportunity to present their petition; over 30, 000 families that were affected by the waterfront massacre like the South African Soweto of 1976 were not included. The panel closed its work without saying that Ken Saro Wiwa and the eight others were not murderers; it jumped to say that the Ogoni 45 and Ogoni 96 are all heroes, but who murdered them?

Since then, the government of Obasanjo thereafter went on to say that the issues of the violation of the Ogoni people is solved: that includes women who were forced into premature delivery and abortion due to multiple rape and that were traumatized. Their issues were opened on national television with no forms of compensation, no traumatic counseling and no prosecutions. The cases are closed; there is now “peace”. The next thing is how to bring back Shell to start operations. The Peace and Reconciliation Committee set up by the government portend that the Ogoni and Shell are having a problem, exonerating itself, without talking about the Land Use Decree or the Ogoni Bill of Rights. Summarily, on the 14th of May 2007, Kukah and the government were in Ogoniland to hold a spiritual cleansing when their phony environmental cleaning failed through the resistance of the people. He flew to Cape Town to tell journalists that it was fine and brag about how he had been the messiah of the Ogoni people.

Anger boils in me to hear this man talk as if without him the Ogoni people do not know what they wanted. This is a man that lives in the north and did not know how the Ogoni people were mobilized, today, Ken is death and he wants to posit himself to be the political messiah of Ogoni people. In the 1950s, the Ogonis had Birabi, not Kukah, in 1966/7, we had Ken in his early twenties directing our people, why do Kukah think that in 2007, we have suddenly slipped backward that we cannot talk or articulate our demands. Kukah has a lot of troubles in Kataf where he comes from. l have met someone from his family and l know that he is not as popular in his family as he is on the pages of the newspaper.

Peter: Kukah made various accusations against Ledum Mittee, implying that he had misused money meant for the Ogoni people and development in Ogoniland. How do you feel about these accusations?

Pst. Barry: Kukah was talking to me that day, as if l was a representative of MOSOP; he kept saying, your “president”. The first thing is that, if l represents MOSOP l would not form the Ogoni Solidarity Forum. I would operate MOSOP South Africa. After the meeting, l went to Kukah to deliver a petition; he said, “every where l go in Ogoniland, people say Ledum is a thief, he is the problem and he is this and he is that, but why have people not removed him?” If Kukah says Mitee is anything, l would not deny; what Kukah says about Mitee is only a fragment of what the Ogoni people think of Ledum.

Since Ledum imposed himself to be the president of MOSOP, apart from the day that he ran back to Nigeria without the agreement of his comrades, he has not been able to call a rally that brings ten thousand Ogoni people together. MOSOP now runs as a Government Owned Non Government Organization (GONGO), Ledum believes so much in negotiating without taking the mandate of the people. He tells the government and Shell what he thinks is “right” for the Ogoni people and not what the Ogoni people tell him to say. MOSOP is so bureaucratized that the ordinary Ogoni people do not know what is happening again. During the time of Ken, there was no sophisticated MOSOP office but everybody knew where we were going, when the next rally would hold, when the next blockade of the pipeline would take place. People gave their vehicles, time, bicycles and anything that they can give for the struggle.

Today, MOSOP does not present the Ogoni Bill of Rights to the government whenever the opportunities are given: Ledum and his staff members are always writing proposals for boreholes, repairs of schools, amendment of roads, painting of maternity, training of 10 to 15 girls to learn how to bake cake or do hair. Let us put it this way, Ken Saro Wiwa had the money that could have sent not less than one hundred thousand Ogoni people to learn trades, craft and even go to universities. So if that is what he wanted to achieve for the Ogoni people, why did he spend the money on MOSOP and then allowed himself to be killed?

You see, Ledum Mitee may be a good lawyer but he is not an activist, he is not the political figure that the Ogoni need, he lacks what it takes to steer the people politically. He would have done well to be by the side and always wait for court cases when MOSOP has one. But with what he has done, l am afraid that he might have also taken bribes if given the chance, to defend activists against Shell and the government. I therefore did not feel anything; l did not feel worried because of what Kukah said. It is simple, if Mitee is for the people, government officials would be not comfortable with him, Peter Odili7 would not be at his private function, Ledum is a great compromiser, a misfit for the struggle and a disappointment to his education and the present generation of Ogoni. He lacks the boldness of the Ogoni people, he is too jelly to lead MOSOP. l’d prefer a lowly educated and radical person that can take us forward rather than Mitee. He though that Ken was too vociferous and too aggressive in his approach so he wanted to adopt a sanctimonious activism, he prefers pacification, but even in churches where people are supposed to preach peace and love your enemies, we preach fire for fire nowadays; even the orthodox churches have joined the train of fire for fire. Gone are the days that you eat with devil using a long spoon, now, the devil is an enemy, no more no less.

Peter: Finally, how do you see the way forward for the Ogoni struggle, and how could this relate to other struggles (both inside Nigeria and outside)?

Pst. Barry: What l call the second chapter of the Ogoni struggle will definitely start very soon, it is not for me to go into details here but the Ogoni struggle will start soon. The first victory is that we have succeeded in keeping Shell away from our land and they have been denied approximately 540 million barrels of crude oil for 14 years. And never in life again would Shell enter Ogoniland; that should get into their head, the Ogoni people are busy looking for a leader and it is not for the want of idea that we are not in the trench. We need a good commander to take over from Mitee, we thank him for all he has done, but let him rest, he is now 50, weak and afraid to die. He wants to look over his children, but there are a lots of people whose blood is pumping and yearning for real action.

Footnotes

1. MKO Abiola (born. 1937, died. 1998) was a Nigerian businessman, publisher and politician who stood as a Presidential candidate in the elections of 1993. Observers widely agree that Abiola won the election, but the results were annuled by the regime of the then military dictator, Ibrahim Babangida. In the wake of Babangida’s annulment of the elections, power was first handed over to Chief Ernest Shonekan, and then seized by Sani Abacha. After Abiola led protests on the anniversary of the annulled election, he was arrested and charged with treason. He remained in prison till he died (just one month after Abacha) in 1998. While MKO Abiola was a prisoner, his wife, Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, was murdered during a demonstration demanding his release.

2. Muhammadu Buhari, Ibrahim Babangida and Sani Abacha were all military dictators that ruled Nigeria from 1983-85, 1985-1993 and 1993-1998 respectively.

3. The Odi massacre was an attack carried out by the Nigerian military on the (mainly Ijaw) village of Odi in the Delta region, in November 1999.

4. The Hausa and Yoruba are two of Nigeria’s biggest ethnic groups, and since independence (in 1960) those who have controlled the Nigerian state have largely come from these two groups.

5. The Ogoni 4 were four prominent pro-government Ogoni chiefs (Edward Kobani, Samueal Orage, Theophilus Orage and Albert Badey) murdered on 21 May 1994. It was for their murder that Ken Saro Wiwa and the others of the Ogoni 9 were falsely accused and hanged.

6. The Ogoni 9 were nine prominent Ogonis who were accused of murder (of the Ogoni 4) by Sani Abacha’s regime, tried by a military court, and hanged on 10 November 1995. They were: Ken Saro Wiwa, Saturday Dobee, Nordu Eawo, Daniel Gbooko, Paul Levera, Felix Nuate, Baribor Bera, Barinem Kiobel, and John Kpuine.

7. Peter Odili was the governor of Rivers State in Nigeria (where Ogoniland is situated) from May 1999 to May 2007. He is a member of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), in other words, Obasanjo’s party, the ruling party in Nigeria.

Evaluating Rosa Luxemburg day

March 3rd, 2007

Or rather, Rosa Luxemburg morning. After dropping off Edie in Vrygrond, I made my way to Community House, where I was pleasantly surprised by the crowd gathered for the Rosa Luxemburg seminar. I would estimate that it was at least 60% township people, many of whom I know from different community based struggles - in other words, it wasn’t the total academic wankfest that I feared. After milling about for some time, we were broken into groups of about 20 people. I was paired with Nina Benjamin (who now works at LRS) as the “respondent” to my input. In any event, we started with input from everyone about who they were and what they had learned over the past two days - a lot of people’s comments centered on the persistent NGO vs. social movement vs. political party debate, what was on a rather different level from where I pitched my input. Anyway, I forged ahead regardless… I think I was more successful at portraying how capitalism entraps and destroys us then I was at speaking on how resistance can get linked up, because a lot of the inputs suggested I had not been “systematic” enough on that point. Nina’s response was largely supportive, and probably clarified what was (unfortunately, as usual) a bit of a long winded input from my side.

The group was largely women, and they made some good inputs on the way that their struggles start in the very private world of the household - as Selina from SWEAT said, “when do we do the laundry”. The fact that childcare was not provided by the organisers, and Nopasika from Elitha Park AEC had to leave from time to time to look after her son, just further emphasised this point. As I mentioned the question of how do we systematise and build theory out of our resistance was raised, by Molefi in particular. He pointed to the episodic nature of “social movement” struggles where everyone goes home after the police stop shooting at us, and then next time you see new faces with little continuity. There was a general dismissal of the Leninist “vanguard party” style of organising, with the one exception of Mo from WIVL, and this dismissal was a theme that ran throughout the discussions I listened to. I wonder if we’re seeing the end of vanguardism in South Africa, and if so, what it will be replaced by?

After the group discussion there was input from the “international speakers” panel - I must admit, I largely tuned out at this point, although I did enjoy Peter Hudis from News and Letters’ input (not surprising, since News and Letters’ Dunayeskaya-ism was one resource on my journey away from Leninism). I had some great high speed chats with comrades after the conference, re-connected with some old connections and exchanged contacts details with a few new ones.

One question I kept asking people though was “name a prominent South African Black radical intellectual” (radical in the anti-capitalist sense, I guess). My point being that “radical intellectuals” continue to largely be university educated, often middle class and decidedly pale (if not shockingly white) in South Africa. I tend to think that with the vast majority of poor people excluded from the Universities through financial exclusion and the like, we need to build structures for reflection outside the “formal education” space that can provide places to meet and discuss and deepen understanding. I know that would be bloody difficult, but as Andrew Nash pointed out, if it was easy to defeat capital we would have done so already.

It seems the RL Seminar was a step towards those “informal universities”, but it was still donor driven and NGO driven - we were left wondering “what now”? With a lot of work and a bit of luck it might be possible to build spaces for reflection in addition to the occasional activities of ILRIG, etc. Not sure if I have time to work on that, though. We’ll see.

Notes towards a theory

March 3rd, 2007

So I got invited to speak on a panel at the Rosa Luxemburg lecture series organised by Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, ILRIG and AIDC. The topic is attitudes towards the state, the ANC and the “left project”. So here are some notes.

My starting point is that we have to understand capital as enclosure. Capitalism isn’t just about some people being rich and others poor - although that is one aspect of capitalism, capitalism is most clearly characterised as the imposition of the social relation of capital. Capital, as a social relation, organises the process of accumulation so as continually exploit the majority of humanity and the planet through the alienation of the product of their labour from those who labour. That “product of labour” can be a shoe, a car, but also it can be a social relation, such as the harmony within a family, or the labour which goes into reproducing life so that we can get up in the morning, go to work, raise the next generation of workers, etc. Anyway, capital doesn’t get exploitation and alienation “for free”, as some eternal human condition, but it achieves these things by continually enclosing people within its grasp, by cutting off all possibilities of life that don’t refer back to capital.

The classic example is the process whereby the vast majority of humanity was separated from the means of production - in Europe, Africa, Asia, the Americas - i.e. the whole world, land was stolen, common lands were enclosed, villages destroyed, women (or primarily women) burned as witches, leaders imprisoned and execute, social system annihilated so that in the end a proletariat, a class of people who had nothing but their own capacity for labour, was created. That process didn’t just happen once and stop, however - it is continuous. We don’t wake up in the morning and say “oh, I’m a worker! let me get myself to work!”. No - work, that is work for capital, alienated labour, needs to constantly be re-imposed. The lengths to which capital will go to ensure this are sometimes quite tragically funny. For example, in Thembisa, in the mid 1990s, there was a massive struggle over the commodification of electricity… under late Apartheid electricity had been provided to some households, but in a chaotic way, and by the early 1990s no one was paying for electricity. So at first there was this agreement that people should pay - at first a flat rate, then later prepaid electricity was imposed. People responded by protesting, by dumping prepaid meters at the municipality’s door, and also by simply bypassing the meters and making their own electricity connections. After all, they had the skills and resources to wire their own electricity, so why not? The result was that by 1997/1998, some 70% of the electricity used in Thembisa was not paid for - i.e. here was a good that was being supplied on a commodity basis, yet not being treated as a commodity by the people of Thembisa. Just like in Bayview in Durban recently, the people of Thembisa were stubbornly clinging to the notion that electricity might be provided according to some logic besides that of capital.

The response, from the side of the state, was a series of attempts to break the back of Thembisa’s resistance, and the Ekuhurleni details these on their website: in areas where payment rates were low, prepaid electricity was to be used. In areas with even lower repayments, all prepaid meters would be allow for remote metering, so that people’s behaviour could be watched from a distance. And in the “worst” (from the point of view of capital) areas, remote metering prepaid meters would be used, and all overhead wires would be buried underground in such a way that you now need a truck with a hydraulic jack to inspect an electricity cable in parts of Thembisa.

So… capital tries to enclose the entirety of life in its logic. And people resist in a million ways, as varied as burning a tire in the street to block a water cutoff or converting “work time” to “personal time” by browsing your favourite anti-capitalist website. In a million big and small ways, people resist capital every day. They resist being turned into mere “workers”, mere repositories of labour power. Often, as in South Africa, it is the resistance of the poor which is most visible, since the poor, being pushed to the edge, have the most to lose from the predations of capital. Having acquired a degree of visibility, the struggles of the poor might attract the attentions of the “left”, who from time to time either articulate or disarticulate these struggles. More on that just now…

Ok… so this resistance poses a limit to capital - a limit which is continually contested from both sides. It is this resistance - not the state (which I would argue primarily serves as vehicle to regulate the process of capital accumulation), nor any “left” party in isolation, that poses a limit to the inexhaustible appetite of capital.

One step further: resistance grows in so far as it resonates, as one form of resistance resonates with another, as it articulates across space and time. The “memory of the class” that Lenin speaks of is not, in my view, the Party, or any set of theoretical tomes, but it is the set of practices that constitute resistance to capital. It is often hard to trace the history of these practices, but let me try, in one case. In the context of the urban struggles of the 1970s and 1980s you can see, in the writings from the side of capital, a process of re-orientation, re-thinking problems. Faced with growing barriers to capital accumulation - riots and other forms of township protest - capital had to re-invent itself. Along the way, capital in South Africa had to reconsider the “basket of goods”, the share of the social product, that was allocated to the poor, Black majority, and you have this realisation that certain rights are being assumed by those fighting Apartheid. Trevor Gaunt, an electrical engineer who was, in his way, a major theorist of this re-orientation, talks about how the “right of access to energy” is being demanded even at prices which are “sub-economic” in his terms. This was in 1988. So the notion of “social rights” wasn’t something invented by Albie Sachs and put into the Constitution by a set of ANC-aligned intellectuals - here we can see the how resistance, resistance to the misery of Aparthied capitalism, forced open a space to demand rights - not the right to buy electricity, but the right to have electricity.

Of course, almost 20 years on, we see how the struggle for “basic needs” has been recuperated, how through the Masakhane Campaign, and even more powerfully through the use of prepaid technology, commodification, and thus the rule of capital, has re-entered the equation. As the inventor of prepaid meters in South Africa has said, the prepaid meter exists to teach people that nothing is free, to teach people to pay.

So resistance to capital does not automatically articulate into revolt - oh I wish it was that easy. Barriers are constantly being put in the way of the articulation of resistance. Hierarchies such as race and gender serve to disarticulate resistance. Knowledge and theory about resistance often acts to demobilise it, with “experts” writing about the resistance of “non-experts” in such a way as to defuse its dynamics. Similarly, modes of organising - hierarchical parties, “democratic centralism” in all of its variants - appropriate agency to the Party or the Committee and defuse resistance through its displacement to some future imagined time.

Clearly my target here is not just the state, not just the obvious agents of capital, because, yes, of course resistance is disarmed through bullets, through beatings, through less obviously brutal means such as prepaid meters and RDP “starter homes”. But it is also, too often, disarmed by the very actions of those “leftists” who seem to celebrate it.

It doesn’t have to be that way. As a “left”, we can act to defuse hierarchies, to promote common spaces where resistance can articulate, to form transverse links between here and there, then and now. Yes, our memories can also be useful, a resource to remind people of past struggles and lessons learned. Life - and resistance - is not, however, lived in the past. If there is to be a “left project” worthy of that name, it must start from sustained enquiry, deep listening to the rhythms of life and everyday resistance to capital. We have an immense amount of work to do, because in many ways the world in which the “left” made sense is no more. Faced by generations of troublesome workers, capital has disarticulated the circuits of everyday life to make it more fragmented, to break up the easily available “masses”, fragmenting workplaces through distributed production, outsourcing and casualisation. We face an immense challenge - to build spaces where we can find each other and be together, in common, to rebuild notions of solidarity beyond the limitations of the nation state, the workplace, and so on.

In the late 1990s, some of us “leftists” followed the migration of struggle, away from the workplaces where we largely faced defeat and into the township communities where capital was attempting to enclose every aspect of life in chains of commodification. We observed how residents faced ruin through eviction and cutoffs of basic services, and how they - most often the women - stood up and fought. And we were part of the process of carrying resistance from township to township, sometimes bringing stories, sometimes people from one place to another, assisting in the creation of new notions of “us”, those who stand together. I was part of that as part of the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign. I observed the heady days when we stood together against the council and against the banks and the police and made them pause and retreat. I was also there as hierarchies re-asserted themselves, as we discovered the limits of our common language, our inability to develop a commons from where we could develop, beyond being “organised by the sheriff”. From my perspective, I think I assumed too much, as if things were deeper and more grounded than they actually were. Building a new tradition, new ways of being and being together, is not a simple or easy task.

In many ways the “left tradition” which has emerged in the more than 100 years since Kautsky, Luxemburg and Lenin build “social democracy” is tainted beyond redemption. It is not going to be rebuilt, however, out of a book, but only out of experiments in practice, experiments that resonate in the hearts and minds of the multitudes of the dispossessed.

Central place in the universe

August 11th, 2006

Just a quick note: I came across this blog - Team Colors. The call themselves a “collective engaged in ‘militant research’ to provide ’strategic analysis for the intervention in everyday life’”, and the content isn’t that interesting in and of itself - it seems to be mostly adverts for events in New York. The thing that’s interesting about it is what’s in the left sidebar - a collection of links to almost anyone who is everyone in the ‘autonomist’ oriented ‘militant research’, worldwide. A few notable exceptions are kolinko and RED. And if you’re going to link to ‘A Grammar of the Multitude’, why not link to the online text? Anyway, its good to have a site that plays a similar role to that which the John Gray and the libcom library play for other spaces.

Sitemaps and things

August 5th, 2006

So I’ve now installed this Google sitemap generator plugin. Yet one more piece of technology on my already-overloaded server, ‘leftside’. I’ve probably got more stuff on there than you find on many corporate servers - layers of spam filters, mysql databases, stats generation of all kinds - like this web stats page which shows that, beside myself, the only visitor to my web pages is the googlebot. So why am I even writing this, hey?

Struggle…

June 17th, 2006

I just finished watching Cry Freedom (1987) and despite it being after midnight, I can’t sleep. In part because of the intensity of that movie… and it is a seriously good movie, even despite the fact that there’s too much Donald Woods and not enough Steve Biko. I don’t know of any other films that cover Steve Biko’s life and work at all, so I guess we’ll have to settle with this one, eh?

I guess the other reason I’m feeling edgy is that its 30 years since 16 June 1976. Together with some young guys from Vrygrond and one of the women from Overcome (the land occupation next to Vrygrond) I helped organise a youth day thing. One part of my contribution was to make this poster - the original inspiration was a kind of record of deaths - from the thousands at Tlatelolco in 1521 and 1968 to the students of ‘76 to Marcel King (Durban) and Teboho Mkhonza (Harrismith) in 2004 and Javier Santiago and Alexis Benhumea in Atenco just a month ago. The thing about this is that the more I dug, the more blood I seemed to find beneath the ’soil’ of history. Again and again - from the peasant revolts of 14th century Europe to the witch trials to the bloody suppression of the Bhambada Rebellion 100 years ago, to the Dirty War in Argetina in the 70s… etc etc - those in power have drowned rebellion in blood.

And a sense of this terrible history fills me with fear because I know I can hardly say I have nothing to lose. It is possible for life to become a living hell.

And now… we have Zille in charge in Cape Town. I fear this DA administration might bring back the evictions, water cutoffs and other attacks that we saw in large numbers between 2000 and 2002 in Cape Town. In those years neoliberalism was visited on the poor of Cape Town in a million small scale tragedies - for that what these policies are, a million cuts that tear apart human life, reduce it to merely surviving, suck all joy out of it. We learnt a lot in those days - how to reconnect a water supply, how we to build up community organisations - and I’m hoping Zille and her crew won’t be stupid enough to re-start the war… but at the same time, I’m aware that they’ve learned - and one of the things they’ve learned is to repress in small doses. A cutoff here, a threat there. That way fear becomes part of everyday life, and its a diffuse fear, the kind that seldom brings people together precisely because of its randomness.

You see, all that ‘They’ - that is those on the side of power, on the side of oppression, the masters of exploitation - all they need to do is to force us back within ourselves, to ‘privatise’ our problems so that we twist ourselves into contortions to look for solutions. In other words, the arrow strikes inward, we look to change ourselves to ‘fit in’ with the rule of capital rather than looking to each other and finding better ways of living our lives.

What I fear is how well capitalism works as a form of rule, how often that fear succeeds. Biko said something about this during the Black Consciousness trial - something about how our job, as activists fighting for a better world, is to keep hope alive. Or as Walter Benjamin put it: “courage, humor, cunning and fortitude…. constantly call into question every victory, past and present, of the rulers.”

A new title?

May 5th, 2006

Ok, so apparently the title of this blog (the pontificating platform bit) is stupid. So what should it be?

In other news, I just discovered that when I archived my copy of “Voices of a Distant Star” to CD, I somehow saved the wrong version - a version with only French subtitles. Now I’m kinda sad because I wanted to give a copy to a friend (well, swap actually, for a copy of “Dollars and White Pipes”, which I keep seeing only half of (long story there)). Anyway, Voices is one of the few anime films I’ve seen that I really loved (ok, I haven’t seen a lot of anime, but some, like “Metropolis”, just seems a bit forced to me). Oh, another good one was “Spirited Away”. Quite chilling, that one.

In case anyone’s wondering about the high link content of this blog posting, I’m writing this with a newly discovered Firefox extension, Performancing (now, how post-modern is that name? hehe…). Performancing opens a blogging window in the bottom half of your browser window, allowing you to easily copy and paste content from browser to blog. You can even drag and drop images. Very intuitive - that is, once I figured out which button to click to launch it. (Its the PFF SB ICONone). So now my browser is a bit of a kitchen sink - I’ve got FoxyTunes to control my music player, ScrapBook to save web pages (helluva useful for research) and more and more and more. ;)

Anyway, enough for now. Been having a fascinated extended conversation with Rebecca (and obliquely, Ahmed) about power and community (or the lack thereof) and how for transformation to happen in our country / society it is vital that women’s struggles over their very private (but ubiquitous) oppression succeed. And how if JZ wins his rape case (which I suspect he will - we’ll see on Monday), he will set this task backwards as every man will imagine themselves a little-JZ, i.e. a version of this grandstanding arrogant prick, albeit it on a smaller scale. Oh, and I was listening to New Model Army (”All of This”) but now its Fairlight Children.

A trivial blog

April 27th, 2006
I’ve been wasting far too much time recently playing Mount and Blade, a shareware game oriented around medieval combat. Well, combat as well as travelling around the world, trading, a few quests, etc. Its as-yet unfinished and apparently created by a mere two people in Turkey, but my hours wasted are testimony to how playable it is.
One of the main attractions is that the interface works very cleanly. Combat, which involves everything from bows and arrows to lances (on horseback) to swords to crossbows, is a fun combination of simple (essentially gesture based) commands and complex possibilities (especially since most combat takes place out in the open, with lots of room to manuevre).
The game is lacking in storyline, and multi-player (which doesn’t exist) would be helluva fun, but I (and many many other people on the Internet) can’t wait for future developments. Until then I’ll keep playing the beta I’ve got.